|
Jan 31
2012
|
|
[Written for www.beyond400.net]
I'm thinking about some very different cufuffles (sp?) where change is imaginable and hoped for and almost invariably doesn't happen. I'll concede there may be a small adaptation of the existing, but that's about it - it just seems to be the way the world works, sociologically speaking. There's no conspiracy, none is needed, it's just something about the culture of well-established orders and denominations that they are superb at resisting change.
Those very different cufuffles? Now forgetting the rights or wrongs of them: the recent MP's expense scandal, phone hacking, various protests against capitalism - they all seem(ed) to produce far smaller changes than might have been expected from the size of the storm - and these examples had the added momentum of moral outrage. Now I'm not trying to link our BUGB financial crisis or Beyond 400 to those apart from to make the connection that even at those intensities of desire for change, often not much happens. An established order/culture is usually very adept at weathering the storm and co-opting or domesticating the dissenters even though it often does it at the subconscious level.
Now I'm wondering about my own family, the baptists, who I am very fond of - as I see it the only paradigmatic change our order seems unable to resist is a slow and relentless death over many decades, not something we often talk about. I also see that a change of paradigm magnitude is needed and it makes sense for this to happen whilst we still have substantial resources to invest in the outcome, so we can get on with joining in with Jesus' mission in this country. I'm thinking of other denominations ahead of us in decline who are now panicked into change but they have scarce resources left to invest - too late!
Perhaps an answer is for us to continue to give away/leak resources so the new church streams and post-denominational emerging church can develop, or perhaps we need to wait until a lot more dying has happened on the basis that you can't have a resurrection without a death and we're not willing to let go of the old life as yet.
One problem and also a pleasing thing about baptist conversations and Beyond 400 is that I suspect it will be a diversity of voices. I'm not talking about 40 voices here but all those who join the conversations. Now, I'd have a punt that such a broad spread of voices are unlikely to collectively imagine a cohesive vision for others to gather around, that is unless some in the conversation here and beyond emerge as leaders. I don't mean, they get an office or position in a structure, though nothing wrong in that if you are really strong enough to resist co-option by the prevalent culture, but simply that they lead by who they are through internal authority and in organic ways.
Very occasionally there is a group action in an institution that is good, contagious and timely enough to bring deep cultural change. As the baptist story unfolds over the next 2-3 years I hope we can find ways to form a new, cohesive and radical view, a virus to inject into the baptist host to re-found her. Heaven forbid that we just end up with re-structuring
